Darling (Schlesinger, 1965)

Love that early Schlesinger. Right after Billy Liar Schlesinger made Darling, which also marks his second straight collaboration with Julie Christie.

I wish the director had continued to make films like this throughout his career. I really do love his The Day of the Locust, but for my money nothing matches Billy Liar, Darling, and Sunday Bloody SundayDarling is vaguely Kane-like. It’s told in flashbacks, features various relationships, a character ends up alone in a mansion breaking stuff, a fishbowl is almost a surrogate snowglobe.

I like the movie so much in part because of how majestic and pristine the director’s frames look. Here’s Julie Christie’s Diana Scott at the beginning of her relationship with Miles Brand (Laurence Harvey). She starts playing with his safe in a medium shot and then the camera anticipates her movement a bit and tracks right to left:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.48.12 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.48.27 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.48.41 AM

She turns and Schlesinger finds her in these nice wides:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.48.58 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.49.11 AM

Punch in to Miles-

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.49.26 AM

-before this really awesome, really distant shot where Miles wreaths the bottom of the frame and Diana feels tiny:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.49.39 AM

She stands on the table and walks towards him and the camera starts to crane down and tilt up to accommodate her motion:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.50.06 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.50.22 AM

A new angle on him, pushing in. Ostensibly her POV:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.50.43 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.51.21 AM

And then back to this show, now totally craned down to a looming low angle:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.51.38 AM

It’s a nice seduction and Schlesinger’s camera plays the part as well, framing them hugely opposite one-another, before dollying and craning to coax them closer and closer and emphasize the romantic dance of it all.

There’s an emphasis on fish in this film. I liked this shot a lot, which starts with this CU of the fish bowl-

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.52.06 AM

-before pulling out and panning right to show the couple in the background. That fish bowl is most certainly a metaphor, but it’s also just a nice way to transition from one set of inhabitants to another:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.52.25 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.52.36 AM

Schlesinger’s blocking isn’t all fluid moves. Here he uses eyelines and montage to put together a great sex scene. It starts with Diana  in a wide shot (framed by some pretty phallic lights):

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.53.05 AM

We cut to her parking meter outside, turning to “Excess Charge.”:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.53.30 AM

We get this shot-reverse of Miles and Diana. Here’s where eyeline is so important. Where’s he looking?

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.53.50 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.54.04 AM

Her eyes, right? How do we know that? Basic film language. They’re looking to approximately the same place in frame, more or less directly into the lens. The shot-reverse therefore sells the eyeline match.

So when Miles moves downward:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.54.18 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.54.29 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.54.39 AM

We know where he’s going before her reaction shot because of the eyeline match:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.54.49 AM

If her eyes were into the lens, and he moves below the lens…

Schlesinger then cuts back to the parking meter with a little tongue in cheek “Penalty”:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.55.04 AM

The montage isn’t necessary. We get it without it. But it gives some humor to the scene, is a clever way to expand time, and shows that Schlesinger’s got a large bag of tricks.

Later in the film we get those fish again:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.55.59 AM

We cut from them dead in the bowl to them dead in this box:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.56.10 AM

I love this shot. It’s simple, but the perspective is great, and there’s something so sorrowful about it: it’s nearly our POV, and the box ends up so alone, adrift, and forgotten:

Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.56.25 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.56.36 AM Screen shot 2015-07-20 at 1.56.49 AM

All of this and I didn’t even get to Dirk Bogarde. Who’s awesome!

Advertisements

About dcpfilm

Shooting, teaching, writing and watching the Phillies.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Darling (Schlesinger, 1965)

  1. Lory Ghertner says:

    aw, the most beautiful woman to ever walk on Earth shot like an angel. Perfect camera work with a perfect actress; what more could you ask?

  2. Pingback: Best Films of 2015 | dcpfilm

  3. Pingback: Darling, 1965 | EG

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s